guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SHEPHERD] [PATCH] service: Improve 'service-list'.


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: [SHEPHERD] [PATCH] service: Improve 'service-list'.
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:06:40 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:

> From f3d21e3ec8a100a966153d03264639ebe48e8872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:18:00 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] service: Improve 'service-list'.
>
> * modules/shepherd/service.scm (service-list): Use
>   'lookup-canonical-service' on each name instead of removing duplicates
>   from the final list.

[...]

> diff --git a/modules/shepherd/service.scm b/modules/shepherd/service.scm
> index f84d1dd..94f2aae 100644
> --- a/modules/shepherd/service.scm
> +++ b/modules/shepherd/service.scm
> @@ -871,12 +871,13 @@ Return #f if service is not found."
>  
>  (define (service-list)
>    "Return the list of services currently defined."
> -  (delete-duplicates
> -   (hash-fold (lambda (key services result)
> -                (append services result))
> -              '()
> -              %services)
> -   eq?))
> +  (hash-fold (lambda (name services result)
> +               (let ((service (lookup-canonical-service name services)))
> +                 (if service
> +                     (cons service result)
> +                     result)))
> +             '()
> +             %services))

OK, except that we know that SERVICE is necessarily true, because the
canonical service for NAME is necessarily among SERVICES.

So I would remove the ‘if’ and add a comment explaining the above.

OK with this change?

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]