[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc update
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: glibc update |
|
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2016 13:27:22 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
No, it doesn't graft. And it produces the same "version" of glibc, but with a
patch applied for CVE-2015-7547.
Well, you would make sure you cherry-pick the right hash. I can't confirm that
from my phone.
-------- Original Message --------
From: Jookia <address@hidden>
Sent: February 17, 2016 11:28:33 AM EST
To: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: glibc update
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> I tried this. The resulting process downloaded the bootstrap binaries
> and appeared to rebuild *everything*. I haven't had time to figure out
> what actually got rebuilt and if anything is still using the vulnerable
> glibc.
This doesn't graft does it? It'd just bump glibc's version.
Re: glibc update, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/17