[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staying on top of Qt security
From: |
Christopher Allan Webber |
Subject: |
Re: Staying on top of Qt security |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:27:52 -0800 |
Andreas Enge writes:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 02:53:40PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
>> I'm assuming this was directed at me (though I don't work on Pumpa, but
>> I could ask the author things... I do *use* it every day though). What
>> am I being asked here... I'm not sure? Whether Pumpa could be updated
>> to QT 5?
>
> I think so :-)
>
> The alternative question would have been whether we could remove it,
> but I already knew the answer...
>
> Andreas
>From Sazius:
Hi! Pumpa already works with Qt 5, I'm running it on Qt 5.3.2 in Debian
jessie myself. If you have any problems (e.g. with a newer version of
Qt) I would consider it a bug and try to fix it :-)
So it looks like we just need to update the pacakge?
- Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/14
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/18
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security,
Christopher Allan Webber <=
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/21
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Leo Famulari, 2016/02/22
- Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/22
Re: Staying on top of Qt security, Andreas Enge, 2016/02/25