guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing patch on savannah means coreutils can't build


From: Mark H Weaver
Subject: Re: Missing patch on savannah means coreutils can't build
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:30:31 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux)

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> writes:

> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 10:19:51 -0800
>>> Christopher Allan Webber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Earlier today I tried doing a build without substitutes.  I was
>>>> surprised to see this error:
>>>> 
>>>> Starting download of 
>>>> /gnu/store/hg3692jqq4jmhg4qx8d7y67fspimy898-?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0
>>>> From 
>>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0...
>>>>  patch                                         1.2MiB/s 00:00 | 1KiB 
>>>> transferred
>>>> output path 
>>>> `/gnu/store/hg3692jqq4jmhg4qx8d7y67fspimy898-?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0'
>>>>  should have sha256 hash 
>>>> `1dnlszhc8lihhg801i9sz896mlrgfsjfcz62636prb27k5hmixqz', instead has 
>>>> `0zygncr1z1nswmny2vl1havfqswm40vzj0vjvhf5yndavhzr267j'
>>>> 
>>>> From the coreutils definition:
>>>>             (patches
>>>>              (list (origin
>>>>                      (method url-fetch)
>>>>                      (uri "http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/\
>>>> patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0")
>>>>                      (sha256
>>>>                       (base32
>>>>                        
>>>> "1dnlszhc8lihhg801i9sz896mlrgfsjfcz62636prb27k5hmixqz"))
>>>>                      (file-name "coreutils-tail-inotify-race.patch"))))))
>>>> 
>>>> But indeed, it's not surprising that there's a hash mismatch... there's
>>>> nothing here!
>>>> 
>>>>   
>>>> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/patch/?id=3ba68f9e64fa2eb8af22d510437a0c6441feb5e0
>>>> 
>>>
>>> I updated coreutils on core-updates which included removing the patch from
>>> the package definition.
>>
>> Thanks!  In case it's useful, here's a patch which includes the patch
>> itself rather than pulling it down via http.
>
> I fixed this differently, in commit 1a51cbc825, by simply removing the
> "/" before the "?" in the URL.

I had to revert this, because it caused a full rebuild.
To be continued...

     Mark



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]