Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add erlang.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:44:46 -0500
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:45:39PM -0800, Steve Sprang wrote:
>> > It looks like downloading the tarball from erlang.org works now.
>> > Here's an improved patch.  
>> > +     (lambda* _
>> > +       (let ((escripts
>> > +              (append
>> > +               (find-files "." "\\.escript")
>> > +               (find-files "lib/stdlib/test/escript_SUITE_data/")
>> > +               '("erts/lib_src/utils/make_atomics_api"
>> > +                 "erts/preloaded/src/add_abstract_code"
>> > +                 "lib/diameter/bin/diameterc"
>> > +                 "lib/reltool/examples/display_args"
>> > +                 "lib/reltool/examples/mnesia_core_dump_viewer"
>> > +                 "lib/snmp/src/compile/snmpc.src"
>> > +                 "make/verify_runtime_dependencies"
>> > +                 "make/emd2exml.in"))))
>> > +         (substitute* escripts
>> > +           (("/usr/bin/env") (which "env"))))))
>> > +         (add-before
>> > +             'configure 'set-erl-top
>> > +           (lambda* _
>> > +             (setenv "ERL_TOP" (getcwd)))))  
>> 
>> I _think_ that 'lambda _' would be appropriate here. I need a real
>> Schemer to weigh in ;)
>> 
>
> I'm definately not a "real schemer," but since the lambda only leads into the
> let (ie. one item), I'm pretty sure 'lambda _' should be sufficient.

Correct.  ‘lambda*’ is for when one wants to use optional or keyword
arguments (info "(guile) lambda* and define*").

Ludo’.