[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Texlive-texmf
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Texlive-texmf |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:04:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>>
>> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> >> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
>> >> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake,
>> >> > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion.
>> >> > So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days.
>> >> OK.
>> >
>> > Well, in the end this is not so easily possible.
>> >
>> > gnuplot depends on texlive-bin as a native-input. I replaced this by
>> > texlive-minimal, but I think the native input can be dropped completely.
>>
>> Not sure. Eric added the dependency on TeX Live in 97003b5c.
>> Eric, WDYT?
>
> Gnuplot looks for some binaries to determine whether and where to
> install some latex sty files. As long as those are still installed with
> texlive-minimal, that should be fine. I used texlive-bin in order to
> remove the heavyweight texlive dependency.
Would Gnuplot’s own sty files still be installed if we remove the
dependency? Or are they redundant with what TeX Live provides?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/03/02
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Andreas Enge, 2016/03/02
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/03/03
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Andreas Enge, 2016/03/05
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/03/07
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Andreas Enge, 2016/03/07
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Eric Bavier, 2016/03/07
- Re: Texlive-texmf,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Texlive-texmf, Eric Bavier, 2016/03/11