guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Texlive-texmf


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: Texlive-texmf
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:04:14 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Eric Bavier <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:41:44 +0100
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:
>> 
>> > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:04:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:  
>> >> Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:  
>> >> > This was the original reason (plus easier debugging) that I kept the
>> >> > internal packages -bin and -texmf public; I think it was a mistake,
>> >> > since it seems to lead to a lot of confusion.
>> >> > So I will hide both the internal packages one of these days.  
>> >> OK.  
>> >
>> > Well, in the end this is not so easily possible.
>> >
>> > gnuplot depends on texlive-bin as a native-input. I replaced this by
>> > texlive-minimal, but I think the native input can be dropped completely.  
>> 
>> Not sure.  Eric added the dependency on TeX Live in 97003b5c.
>> Eric, WDYT?
>
> Gnuplot looks for some binaries to determine whether and where to
> install some latex sty files.  As long as those are still installed with
> texlive-minimal, that should be fine.  I used texlive-bin in order to
> remove the heavyweight texlive dependency.

Would Gnuplot’s own sty files still be installed if we remove the
dependency?  Or are they redundant with what TeX Live provides?

Thanks,
Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]