[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2016 17:03:50 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> skribis:
> From fc6dd2108dae76e09e1bfcd6d04c36943469434f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 22:18:48 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Suggest `guix.scm' for upstream maintainers.
>
> * doc/guix.texi (Invoking guix package): Suggest `guix.scm'.
> ---
> doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
> index 06b40fa..f23c7fc 100644
> --- a/doc/guix.texi
> +++ b/doc/guix.texi
> @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ As an example, @var{file} might contain a definition
> like this
> @verbatiminclude package-hello.scm
> @end example
>
> -Developers may find it useful to include such a @file{package.scm} file
> +Developers may find it useful to include such a @file{guix.scm} file
Fine with me, but what’s the rationale? I think we need Dave’s approval
on this crucial part. :-)
Ludo’.