Re: addresses: works around gnunet-gtk, gnunet, attention push for powwow, un-font, general question

[Nils Gillmann]

Nils Gillmann <address@hidden> writes:

> Then there's the recent patch for gnunet-gtk 0.10.1, a short
> message exchange with Christian Grothoff, Jookia, and myself
> today leads to the following conclusion which will be further
> explained in a new patch series coming either today or on sunday:
>
> - we will keep 0.10.1 (please apply the recent patch I did send)
> - I will modify the description of 0.10.1 related packages of
>   gnunet and gnunet-gtk to relect cg's and my conversation's
>   outcome.
> - gnunet will get a new, additional package, co-authored with
>   Jookia, using a recent svn checkout which will be explained
>   in the message send with the patch.
> TL;DR in before I send them:
>
> 0.10.1 is old. There has been no new release so far because the
> next one needs to be stable. CADET has open bugs which need to be
> fixed to get to a new release candidate. API *and* protocol
> compability will break with /newer/ versions than 0.10.1 (0.10.1
> incompatible towards >0.10.1), which is why you should use SVN
> when you want to test the in development network stack and the
> application developed around and inside it, to get a 2 year old
> version of it is bound to provide an outdated experience.

correction: will break WHEN a new release candidate is out, I
can't confirm or deny 0.10.1 vs svn checkout compability issues,
but my personal experience with 0.10.1 vs svn is definitely that
the 0.10.1 had big networking issues for my setup, svn just
works.

In addition, the description really needs the update I send out
with the patch last weekend. It will soon match the description
on gnunet.org as I will update it there too in a way which is
similar to the one provided here.


-- 
ng
personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/Echt_Dezentrales_Netz/en