Re: [PATCH] licenses: Add Apache Software License 1.1.

[Leo Famulari]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:55:02AM +0100, Roel Janssen wrote:
> From 02888e1aa137142a2a5ad9edc400df04514e7e3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 08:50:23 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] licenses: Add Apache Software License 1.1.
> 
> * guix/licenses.scm (asl1.1): New variables.

Thanks, pushed as f88ce395!

> ---
>  guix/licenses.scm | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/guix/licenses.scm b/guix/licenses.scm
> index 61e6793..71c0736 100644
> --- a/guix/licenses.scm
> +++ b/guix/licenses.scm
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
>    #:use-module (srfi srfi-9)
>    #:export (license? license-name license-uri license-comment
>              agpl3 agpl3+
> -            asl2.0
> +            asl1.1 asl2.0
>              boost1.0
>              bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
>              non-copyleft
> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@
>             "https://gnu.org/licenses/agpl.html";
>             "https://gnu.org/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html";))
>  
> +(define asl1.1
> +  (license "ASL 1.1"
> +           "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache1.1";
> +           "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#apache1";))
> +
>  (define asl2.0
>    (license "ASL 2.0"
>             "http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Apache2.0";
> -- 
> 2.7.3
> 

> Dear Guix,
> 
> I've added the Apache Software License 1.1 because I intend to submit a
> package that uses this license later.  The GNU licenses page says the
> following about it:
> 
> > This is a permissive non-copyleft free software license. It has a few
> > requirements that render it incompatible with the GNU GPL, such as
> > strong prohibitions on the use of Apache-related names.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Roel