[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSoC] Bourne-shell compiler front-end for Guile
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [GSoC] Bourne-shell compiler front-end for Guile |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2016 15:05:08 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 23:27:25 +0100
> address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Hi Efraim,
>>
>> Thanks for your proposal!
>>
>> This project can be pretty fun, I think, and quite rewarding if it
>> indeed allows us to get rid of a bunch of bootstrap binaries.
>>
>> As I see it, the project covers mostly two areas:
>>
>> 1. Lexing & parsing. This compiler front-end will need a real parser
>> for the Bourne shell syntax, notably semicolon-separated command
>> sequences, pipes, brace-delimited blocks, functions, variables, and
>> ‘test’ and ‘[’.
>>
>> The available tools could be SILex + (system base lalr) (the latter
>> is part of Guile, the former is maintained separately; a copy can
>> be found in Guile-RPC for instance.)
>>
>> 2. Run-time support: redirections, pipes, background execution, C-c
>> (SIGINT) and C-z (SIGTSTP), globbing, and so on.
>>
>> Guile provides just the basic here, and a little more with (ice-9
>> popen). Scsh and its Guile port(s) provide a lot of that, so it
>> might be a good idea to see what can be stolen from these.
>>
>> It may be that some of your CS classes cover some of this ground (a
>> fairly common programming project here at university is to implement a
>> small shell precisely because it covers several areas.)
>>
>> How does that sound?
>>
>> Perhaps one way to get started would be by looking at the available
>> tools for #1, and experimenting with hacks for #2, possibly borrowing
>> code from Scsh.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Sounds like lots of fun, I'm really looking forward to it. And it sounds like
> I'll need to dive deeper into bash to see what I get to implement
I guess a related question is how confident/familiar you feel with the
two areas above. The agenda could be adjusted as a function of that.
Thanks,
Ludo’.