[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: python general question (setup.py)
From: |
Nils Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: python general question (setup.py) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Mar 2016 02:03:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Cyril Roelandt <address@hidden> writes:
> On 03/25/2016 11:02 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> I have a question on python.
>> My theory is that this is true:
>> If I write a setup.py and contribute it to a project because I
>> want to make an "easier"[1] install in Guix and elsewhere,
>> I feed the "one packagemanager per language" thing.
>>
>
> Not really. You can use setup.py without pip. Think of setup.py as some
> kind of Makefile for Python.
>
>> Is setup.py the equivalent of a package manager in python or does
>> it serve more purposes? I would like to know if I want to follow
>> my current task in either fixing the setup.py I started for the
>> upcoming bitmessage 0.6 release or if I want to write a Guix
>> package without using out python-setup-tools which require
>> setup.py to be present.
>>
>
> No, the equivalent of a package manager is "pip", which uses packages
> from pypi.python.org.
Ah, interesting. Thanks!
> If we are talking about
> https://bitmessage.org/wiki/Compiling_instructions , I must say the
> installation instructions are a bit weird for a Python project.
Yeah, I'm not focused on bitmessage.org, but I suppose it's the
same.
https://github.com/mailchuck/PyBitmessage will soon be merged
into https://github.com/Bitmessage/PyBitmessage , that's where I
try to work with to get away from using a git checkout.
> Cyril.
>
>
--
ng
personal contact: http://krosos.sdf.org
EDN: https://wiki.c3d2.de/EDN