Re: Specifying package patches in a more convenient form

[Alex Kost]

Andreas Enge (2016-04-09 14:42 +0300) wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:54:49PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Alex Kost <address@hidden> skribis:
>> > P.S.  Actually, I don't like 'search-patches' name.  Better ideas?
>> No!  I like it.
>
> How about "find-patches"? This would be analogous to "find-files".

Since it is build on 'search-patch' procedure, 'search-patches' name
looks like a more natural choice to me, but I don't have a preference.
I agree on any name (I just like none of them :-)).

-- 
Alex