[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pcmanfm version update
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: pcmanfm version update |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Apr 2016 22:59:03 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:19:58PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:37:13PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> > But these are 2 different packages from 2 different sources, so I still
> > think it makes sense to update them in 2 commits. I hope other people
> > tell what is preferable here on their opinions, thanks.
>
> Yes, we always work on one package at a time.
>
> Andreas
>
We do have some packages that have to be updated together, acme and
letsencrypt, python-cryptography and python-cryptography-vectors. But
those do have a commit message that they are updated together.
Does either libfm or pcmanfm build independant of the other being
upgraded?
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- mplayer version update, rain1, 2016/04/04
- Re: mplayer version update, Mark H Weaver, 2016/04/04
- pcmanfm version update, rain1, 2016/04/07
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Alex Kost, 2016/04/09
- Message not available
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Alex Kost, 2016/04/09
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Andreas Enge, 2016/04/09
- Re: pcmanfm version update,
Efraim Flashner <=
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/04/09
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Leo Famulari, 2016/04/09
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/04/13
- Re: pcmanfm version update, Leo Famulari, 2016/04/13