guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: glib: Disable tests in build phases instead of patc


From: 宋文武
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: glib: Disable tests in build phases instead of patches.
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 20:25:16 +0800
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> writes:

> [...]
>
> /tmp/guix-build-glib-2.46.1.drv-0/glib-2.46.1/gio/tests [env]#
> ./gapplication
> /gapplication/no-dbus: OK
> /gapplication/no-appid: OK
> /gapplication/properties: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied:
> Failed to set fd limit to 65536: Operation not permitted
> OK
> /gapplication/app-id: OK
> /gapplication/local-actions: Segmentation fault
>
> followed by:
> /tmp/guix-build-glib-2.46.1.drv-0/glib-2.46.1/gio/tests [env]#
> ./gapplication -s '/gapplication/local-actions'
> /gapplication/no-dbus: OK
> /gapplication/no-appid: OK
> /gapplication/properties: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied:
> Failed to set fd limit to 65536: Operation not permitted
> OK
> /gapplication/app-id: OK
> /gapplication/local-command-line: OK
> /gapplication/resource-path: OK
> /gapplication/test-help: OK
> /gapplication/test-busy: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: Failed
> to set fd limit to 65536: Operation not permitted
> OK
> /gapplication/test-handle-local-options1: OK
> /gapplication/test-handle-local-options2: OK
> /gapplication/test-handle-local-options3: OK
>
> so /gapplication/local-actions completely failed for me, so with my
> understanding of the error that I got above (only 4/12 tests run) the
> best course would be to patch/substitute the the
> /gapplication/local-actions test to either pass for real or to just
> return true. Or to tell it that there are only 4 (or 11) tests
>
> [...]
>
> Actually, I attached test-suite.log and gapplication.log but deleted the
> build environment before sending, and when I rebuilt it it built cleanly
> for me. I'm now rebuilding it with the --check flag (and -K). And it
> built again successfully.
Ah, I miss this email.  So it seems we only need to disable this randomly
failing 'local-actions' test.

Pushed, hopefully it will work.

Thanks!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]