[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: core-updates vs. core-updates-next
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: core-updates vs. core-updates-next |
|
Date: |
Fri, 27 May 2016 10:56:35 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> address@hidden (Leo Famulari) skribis:
>
> > commit b0bbf2491e346a355c1ec5584c16de7fbfa14f5e
> > Author: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu May 26 13:24:41 2016 -0400
> >
> > gnu: expat: Remove replacement.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (expat)[replacement]: Remove field.
> > (expat/fixed): Remove variable.
>
> [...]
>
> > commit aee7f2e98ae2cbbd0cd765beda6c0a4279929c94
> > Author: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu May 26 22:45:51 2016 -0400
> >
> > gnu: libxslt: Update to 1.1.29.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/libxslt-CVE-2015-7995.patch: Delete file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Remove it.
> > * gnu/packages/xml.scm (libxslt): Update to 1.1.29.
> > [source]: Remove patch.
>
> Clarification: until Hydra has started building all of core-updates,
> it’s OK to push non-core updates like these to core-updates.
>
> There are still a couple of issues at
> <https://hydra.gnu.org/jobset/gnu/core-updates> to be fixed in the core
> packages before we can ask Hydra to build all of core-updates. Until
> then, feel free! :-)
Okay, do you think I should move the commits from core-updates-next to
core-updates?