[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update]
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update] |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:07:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:13:04PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Icedtea 1.13.11 was released, which fixes a number of security bugs:
>> >
>> > http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2016/05/04/security-icedtea-1-13-11-for-openjdk-6-released/
>> >
>> > I tried to build it with the attached patch, but it fails for me. I've
>> > attached the tail of the build log. Any advice?
>>
>> The patch looks good to me. If I understand correctly this may be
>> because we’re bootstrapping with GCJ, which implements Java 1.5. You
>> can see in the log that “javac” runs with “-source 1.5 -target 5”, which
>> means that it assumes that the code is written in compliance with Java
>> 1.5. Maybe this file simply is not valid Java 1.5.
>>
>> According to http://stackoverflow.com/a/8697805/519736 address@hidden is
>> interpreted more strictly in 1.5. I don’t know much about Java and I
>> haven’t looked at the sources in question, but I guess there are
>> address@hidden annotations above the five method declarations. We might be
>> able to just remove them.
>>
>> I think this should be reported to Andrew; looks like a bug as
>> bootstrapping with GCJ should work for OpenJDK 6.
>
> Done: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2990
Thank you. Since this has been fixed here
http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/rev/60be25a84f2d
we should apply this change to the 1.13.11 sources.
~~ Ricardo
- Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update],
Ricardo Wurmus <=