guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update]


From: Ricardo Wurmus
Subject: Re: Trying to build latest Icedtea / Java 6 [security update]
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 08:07:53 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:13:04PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > Icedtea 1.13.11 was released, which fixes a number of security bugs:
>> >
>> > http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2016/05/04/security-icedtea-1-13-11-for-openjdk-6-released/
>> >
>> > I tried to build it with the attached patch, but it fails for me. I've
>> > attached the tail of the build log. Any advice?
>> 
>> The patch looks good to me.  If I understand correctly this may be
>> because we’re bootstrapping with GCJ, which implements Java 1.5.  You
>> can see in the log that “javac” runs with “-source 1.5 -target 5”, which
>> means that it assumes that the code is written in compliance with Java
>> 1.5.  Maybe this file simply is not valid Java 1.5.
>> 
>> According to http://stackoverflow.com/a/8697805/519736 address@hidden is
>> interpreted more strictly in 1.5.  I don’t know much about Java and I
>> haven’t looked at the sources in question, but I guess there are
>> address@hidden annotations above the five method declarations.  We might be
>> able to just remove them.
>> 
>> I think this should be reported to Andrew; looks like a bug as
>> bootstrapping with GCJ should work for OpenJDK 6.
>
> Done: http://icedtea.classpath.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2990

Thank you.  Since this has been fixed here

   http://icedtea.classpath.org/hg/icedtea6/rev/60be25a84f2d

we should apply this change to the 1.13.11 sources.

~~ Ricardo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]