Re: Install gpg2 as gpg

[Leo Famulari]

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> Why not just drop gpg-2.0 then?
> >
> > All three GnuPG branches (1.4, 2.0, 2.1) are actively maintained. Why
> > drop 2.0?
> 
> +1
> 
> Besides, I use 2.0, because for some reason 2.1 has always failed for me
> (though I never took the time to investigate.)
> 
> Anyway, this patch is just about how we name the command.  That the
> command is called ‘gpg2’ is a well-known annoyance, and Werner
> recommends not doing that anyway.

Is there a consensus on the way forward? Should we apply this patch to
gnupg-2.1? Is anyone willing to test and maintain patches against
gnupg-2.0 (not me)?