Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update

[Ludovic Courtès]

address@hidden (宋文武) skribis:

> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> [...]
>>
>> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at
>> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the
>> manpage timestamps.
> Cool!
>
>>
>> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but
>> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a
>> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to
>> another branch?
>>
> I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it
> frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far).

(Oops, I replied before seeing your message.)  I have a slight
preference for ‘core-updates’, which I hope can be merged within a few
days.  Sounds good?

Ludo’.