Re: libgd security update

[Leo Famulari]

On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > This patch series was not trivial to create; removing the binary diffs
> > required some care, some of the patches depended on changes associated
> > with the removed binary diffs, and some upstream fixes were reverted and
> > re-committed with changes. Will someone double-check this patch series
> > for mistakes?
> 
> I am not familiar with neither gd nor this CVE, but at first sight the
> changes make sense to me.  AIUI they are mostly those in upstream’s
> repo, minus the binary test data, so that should be fine.

Right!

> I’d say OK for both.

Thanks for the review. Pushed!