[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
Subject: |
Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Jul 2016 09:02:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 08:28:30AM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > if we support a decentralized system of externally-managed
> > repositories.
>
> No. Break them.
>
> If you're running an external Guix repository and don't bother to follow
> the main development branch(es) with some attention, your users deserve
> to get regular breakage warnings as a subtle hint that maybe they
> shouldn't be trusting you with their software.
Exactly.
I am thinking plugins themselves can be part of the Guix package tree
and come with tests. That way we can keep an eye on 'infrastructure'
code.
Pulling in packages from elsewhere - it is up to the registries to
test things and maintain compatibility.
> There seem to be two different meanings of ‘support’ at play here:
> - adding decentralised repository support to Guix so it can at least
> be done in a clean user-friendly way, which I think is excellent
> vs.
> - promising some kind of API stability to those repositories, which
> I think is terrible.
Yeah. I am not looking for that. I think it is good to break stuff for
future considerations. That is one advantage FOSS has. The code is out
in the open...
I also agree that we should encourage freedom and exploration.
Pj.
--
- A registry for distributed sources and binaries, (continued)
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Mark H Weaver, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Jookia, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Jookia, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Leo Famulari, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Pjotr Prins, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Mathieu Lirzin, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Andreas Enge, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Jookia, 2016/07/24
- Re: A registry for distributed sources and binaries, Andreas Enge, 2016/07/24
- replying to a message of a mailing list you were not subscribed to, Danny Milosavljevic, 2016/07/24
- Re: replying to a message of a mailing list you were not subscribed to, Danny Milosavljevic, 2016/07/24
- Re: replying to a message of a mailing list you were not subscribed to, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/07/25