[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:34:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Hello!
Florian Paul Schmidt <address@hidden> skribis:
> I'm following the Guix-Project, even if not contributing much because
> of time constraints. The one, very simple to implement, thing that
> would make following the project more easy IMHO would be a separate
> list for patches. Or maybe the other way around: A separate list for
> more general discussion :)
>
> What do you think?
GCC has a gcc-patches@ mailing list in addition to address@hidden However, as a
passerby, I found it’s not super clear whether to use gcc@, or
gcc-patches@, or the Bugzilla instance. So I’m not sure it would
improve the situation.
Thoughts?
FWIW, I filter help-guix, guix-devel, and guix-sysadmin in separate
folders, and then I use Gnus’ scoring mechanism for things in guix-devel
(you could assign a low score to messages whose subject contains
“[PATCH]” for instance.)
Ludo’.
Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2016/07/26