Re: [PATCH v4 00/16] Add missing dependencies of Spamassassin

[ng0]

Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:

>> Should I review v3 or v4? 
>
> v4. I made a mistake in v3 - that's why it has a hole in the series - I 
> didn't send it.
>
>> It would be easier if the patches would have references in one single 
>> thread, but I can work this way too. 
>
> Huh, they should be a tree with the cover letter at the root now.

Sorry, my mistake this should have been more precise:

I meant to say:
It can lead to confusion when there are several threads with different
versions of the patches, including singles ones, not bundled, and
bundled ones.

I will start looking into these patches now, thanks.

>>If this
>> makes all the packages before obsolete I'll mark them as such and review
>> only these versions.
>
> It does make all the "perl" packages (only perl) by me from before obsolete.

-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org