[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License auditing
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: License auditing |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2016 14:05:06 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 07:55:11PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> A human would still have to review the non-1:1 things - there could
> always be strange exceptions in the README or whatever - but the
> majority of cases should work just fine.
There could also be binaries with no source code, some code with a
unique license, or countless other ways to confuse a license parser.