[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License auditing
|
From: |
David Craven |
|
Subject: |
Re: License auditing |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2016 20:15:30 +0200 |
> There could also be binaries with no source code, some code with a
> unique license, or countless other ways to confuse a license parser.
Well we do have a sizeable existing test-suite so that's a plus...
> "...either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later
> version."
That answers my question thank you!