[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 08:57:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) |
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:31:29PM -0700, Dylan Jeffers wrote:
> When submitting patches that require other patches I've submitted,
> should I put them together in a single patch, or keep them separate
> like this?
For patches that depend on each other, sending them as a "patch series"
will communicate the dependencies and ensure that they apply properly.
If you've made your patches on a branch besides master, you can do:
$ git format-patch -n master
... and attach those patches to an email.
You can also use `git send-email`, which uses `git format-patch` but
will also send the patch series if you set up SMTP and configure Git to
use it.
Can you resubmit these two patches using that method? Normally I
wouldn't ask you to do that but, in this case, this patch does not apply
cleanly after having applied the patch for python-requests-oauthlib;
they both have the same leading context:
> @@ -9852,3 +9853,34 @@ etc.")
> (package
> (inherit base)
> (name "ptpython2"))))
Thanks!
- [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Dylan Jeffers, 2016/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Dylan Jeffers, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Dylan Jeffers, 2016/08/14
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Dylan Jeffers, 2016/08/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/19
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Danny Milosavljevic, 2016/08/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/15
- Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-pypump, Leo Famulari, 2016/08/16