[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Our git just broke
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: Our git just broke |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 15:36:06 +0000 |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to
>> this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The
>> new package builds fine. Can someone take a look please?
>>
>>
>> b3885778e8e438e8526a8ee9e96072fd00f5cae5 is the first bad commit
>> commit b3885778e8e438e8526a8ee9e96072fd00f5cae5
>> Author: ng0 <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed Aug 10 10:04:29 2016 +0000
>>
>> gnu: Add stagit.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (stagit): New variable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
>
> Oops! I've reverted the commit.
>
> The variable expat is defined twice. We need to change
> version-control.scm to use a license prefix rather than selecting
> licenses.
>
> ng0, will you update version-control.scm to use a license prefix and
> re-send an updated stagit patch?
On the subject of stagit, this is a software written by the cloud of
people named "2f30", associated with the ideas of suckless. Should this
go into suckless.scm and not version-control? The logical place for me
is version-control, the second logic place is suckless.scm.
--
♥Ⓐ ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org