guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Our git just broke


From: ng0
Subject: Re: Our git just broke
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2016 15:36:06 +0000

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 10:41:59PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I cannot currently build git on the master branch. I bisected and got to
>> this commit. I had a quick look but couldn't see what the problem was. The
>> new package builds fine. Can someone take a look please?
>> 
>> 
>> b3885778e8e438e8526a8ee9e96072fd00f5cae5 is the first bad commit
>> commit b3885778e8e438e8526a8ee9e96072fd00f5cae5
>> Author: ng0 <address@hidden>
>> Date:   Wed Aug 10 10:04:29 2016 +0000
>> 
>>     gnu: Add stagit.
>> 
>>     * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (stagit): New variable.
>> 
>>     Signed-off-by: Leo Famulari <address@hidden>
>
> Oops! I've reverted the commit.
>
> The variable expat is defined twice. We need to change
> version-control.scm to use a license prefix rather than selecting
> licenses.
>
> ng0, will you update version-control.scm to use a license prefix and
> re-send an updated stagit patch?

On the subject of stagit, this is a software written by the cloud of
people named "2f30", associated with the ideas of suckless. Should this
go into suckless.scm and not version-control? The logical place for me
is version-control, the second logic place is suckless.scm.
-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]