Re: [PATCH 11/13] gnu: vlc: Fix regression caused by update to qt 5.7.

[Leo Famulari]

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 01:06:39AM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> I left the qtbase string as documentation, as has been done in other
> places. Do you think it's a bad idea (to not use the same string as
> the package name)?

My understanding is that the 'qt' package is not the same thing as the
'qtbase' package. 'qt' is the all-in-one Qt, whereas 'qtbase' is the
base package of the modularized Qt that Efraim has been working on.

So, I do think it's a good idea to use that string as documentation but,
in this case, I think that using "qtbase" is inappropriate. What do you
think?