[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
[PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk. |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:21:54 +0000 |
In the commit message, is the ending "in gnunet-gtk" unnecessary? It
almost feels like it.
Thanks for merging the libunique patch.
>From 71c7fa15df9793827e93823eb37c35b4357626cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ng0 <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 23:13:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.
* gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (gnunet-gtk)[inputs]: Add libunique.
[arguments]: Add "--with-libunique" to #:configure-flags.
---
gnu/packages/gnunet.scm | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
index 7887322..b08ba74 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/gnunet.scm
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ services.")
"1p38k1s6a2fmcfc9a7cf1zrdycm9h06kqdyand4s3k500nj6mb4g"))))
(arguments
`(#:configure-flags
- (list "--without-libunique"
+ (list "--with-libunique"
"--with-qrencode"
(string-append "--with-gnunet="
(assoc-ref %build-inputs "gnunet")))))
@@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ services.")
("gtk+" ,gtk+)
("libextractor" ,libextractor)
("glade3" ,glade3)
- ("qrencode" ,qrencode)))
+ ("qrencode" ,qrencode)
+ ("libunique" ,libunique)))
(native-inputs
`(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
("libglade" ,libglade)))
--
2.9.3
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
- [PATCH] gnu: gnunet-gtk: Add libunique support in gnunet-gtk.,
ng0 <=