guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Addition to gnu-build-system: make test.


From: John Darrington
Subject: Re: Addition to gnu-build-system: make test.
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 11:41:03 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

"make check" is what the Gnu Coding Standards specify:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Standard-Targets

So I think it should stay as it is - at least for the gnu-build-system

J'

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:05:47PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
     On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 04:14:25PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
     > 
     > 2016-08-26 15:16 <ng0> recently when I pointed out to someone and they
     > added a make check which just calls the original make test, I was
     > wondering if our gnu build system should try for make test and make
     > check.. this seems to be very common test instead of check
     > 2016-08-26 15:19 <kyamashita> ng0: Or maybe try one if the other fails?
     > 2016-08-26 15:19 <ng0> yes.. very often I had to replace check with just
     > test
     > 2016-08-26 15:21 <kyamashita> It might be worth bringing up on the
     > guix-devel mailing list to see what others think.
     > 2016-08-26 15:21 <ng0> yes.. I will do so later
     > 
     > What do others think? How can we extend gnu-build-system so that make
     > test can be used but make check is not ignored?
     > -- 
     > ng0
     > For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
     > 
     
     I was curious how many times we use test-target:
     
     $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | wc -l
     87
     $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | grep \"test\" | wc -l
     52
     $ grep test-target gnu/packages/*scm | grep \"tests\" | wc -l
     8
     
     I guess the real question is, will running an extra `make test' after
     `make check' break anything? Also, I'm sure some of the makefiles have
     one as an alias of the other, we don't want to run the tests twice.
     
     
     -- 
     Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   ?????????? ??????????
     GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
     Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted



-- 
Avoid eavesdropping.  Send strong encryted email.
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]