[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0
|
From: |
Leo Famulari |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:14:22 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 02:43:58PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I also read about lots of breakage due to the update so I think it’s
> > okay to add it as “openssl-next” for now.
>
> Agreed (though its fine to use “openssl” in the ‘name’ field IMO.)
When I put "openssl" in the 'name' field, as attached, `guix build
openssl` gives me 1.1.0, which is not right. The other *-next packages
all seem to use "name-next" as the name.
0001-gnu-Add-openssl-next.patch
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- [PATCH 1/1] gnu: openssl: Update to 1.1.0., Leo Famulari, 2016/09/01
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/02
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/03
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/05
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/09/06
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] OpenSSL 1.1.0, Leo Famulari, 2016/09/06