guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Should java .jar-filenames include the version?


From: Hartmut Goebel
Subject: Should java .jar-filenames include the version?
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:01:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0

Hi,

as I'm going to release patches for some java packages, I'd like to get consent on one point:

Should java .jar-filenames include the version?

This only effects those .jar for which there is no build.xml (or equivalent) is present and thus #:jar-file is to be specified.

The jar-files currently packaged do not include the version, but most .jar-files build using a build.xml or maven .pom seam to include it. OTOH, the version is already in the prefix, thus it is redundant.

What do you think?

(I personally do not care much, I just want to avoid duplicate work.)


--
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer
Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software Development

Goebel Consult, Landshut
http://www.goebel-consult.de

Blog: http://www.goebel-consult.de/blog/bestanden-iso-27001-lead-implementer
Kolumne: http://www.cissp-gefluester.de/2011-10-aus-der-schublade-in-die-koepfe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]