[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should updaters suggest changes to inputs?
From: |
Efraim Flashner |
Subject: |
Re: Should updaters suggest changes to inputs? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:28:32 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 03:45:39PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> one problem that I’ve stumbled upon with R packages is that new versions
> occasionally depend on new inputs. “guix refresh -u” updates the
> version number and the hash for me, but it doesn’t tell me that new
> inputs are needed — or that existing inputs have been dropped —
> according to upstream’s DESCRIPTION file.
>
> Usually, these things become obvious when I rebuild all updated
> packages, but it’s possible I miss something.
>
> Do you think “guix refresh” should also mention changes to inputs?
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
Like if you were rerunning `guix import foo bar'?
--
Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature