guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla.


From: Kei Kebreau
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla.
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 15:40:37 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:59:31PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:01:33PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote:
>> >> Like below? And how could I then access qscintilla-for-octave from
>> >> maths.scm if it isn't defined publicly?
>> >
>> > Yes, that looks right. But I would put qscintilla-for-octave in
>> > maths.scm to avoid the issue you describe.
>> 
>> So would you say that this is clean enough that I could push both of
>> these changes in their respecitive files before modifying the Octave 
>> definition?
>
> I would wait to push the Qt 4 variant until you have made sure it works
> with Octave.

I have Octave successfully running with a GUI on my machine using the Qt
4 version of the QScintilla patch, though I've yet to test with the
qscintilla-for-octave package.
>
> Also, I didn't notice a difference between the arguments for each
> package variant. If there is no difference, could the Qt 4 variant
> inherit the arguments, too?

There is a small difference in the two fix-Makefiles phases. They
replace different folder paths (the Qt 5 version changes the qtbase path to
the package output path, the Qt 4 version changes the qt-4 path to the
package output path).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]