[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr.
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr. |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:48:15 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 09:43:29PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> I commented mariadb + postgresql for now. I want some feedback first if
> you think we should provide it this way, or if we should add both to
> different outputs.
> It would not make much difference in the size of the dependency graph
> unless one creates a opensmtpd-extras-postgresql package for example
> which just builds the postgresql related things.
Is it even possible to split the package up like that? I don't think
it's necessary anyways. I think we should pick a database (I'd choose
postgresql) and add the package. If somebody wants to use mariadb, we
can add it when they request it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Marius Bakke, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Efraim Flashner, 2016/09/08
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., Eric Bavier, 2016/09/09
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/09
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/19
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr.,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: [PATCH]: opensmtpd, opensmtpd-extras, libasr., ng0, 2016/09/21