Re: [PATCH v2] python-lzo + python-lz4

[ng0]

Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:

>> No, it is not. lzo was number 2 in the original patch couple  and is
>> still intended to be applied as such.
>
> I see what you mean but I really doubt that patchwork can see it (also 
> because of the subject it probably will replace the entire set by just this 
> package).
>
Okay, I understand but won't send it again.
I used patchwork for a while, and looking at the past discussions about
alternatives and looking at how much functionality it lacks and almost
no one except ludovic, myself and maybe 2 more people seemed to use
it. So I don't care about patchworks as it is broken. Whoever applies my
patches uses email, no need to adjust my work to a broken tool we
started to test.

Good night
-- 
              ng0