[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile 2.0.13
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Guile 2.0.13 |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:13:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Leo Famulari <address@hidden> skribis:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Given that core-updates with Guile 2.0.12 is on its way and that master
>> is still at 2.0.11, I’d suggest to leave master as-is and focus on
>> core-updates.
>>
>> There we have 2 options:
>>
>> 1. Changing ‘guile-2.0/fixed’ to 2.0.13, but 1,310 packages depend on it.
>>
>> 2. Grafting 2.0.13, which is doable since 2.0.12 and .13 have the same ABI.
>
> Considering that 2.0.13 fixes a bug that is exposed by grafting,
That *was* exposed by grafting; commit
d72267863382041b84a9712eea354882be72ef55 works around the problem, so
that’s fine.
> We could always un-graft it between releases if Hydra isn't busy.
Yeah. I was thinking that we’d want to finish this core-updates cycle
and then later do an ungrafting round or something.
WDYT?
Ludo’.
- Guile 2.0.13, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/10/12
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/10/12
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Leo Famulari, 2016/10/12
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Christopher Allan Webber, 2016/10/12
- Re: Guile 2.0.13,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Leo Famulari, 2016/10/12
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/10/13
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Efraim Flashner, 2016/10/15
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Leo Famulari, 2016/10/15
- Re: Guile 2.0.13, Ludovic Courtès, 2016/10/18