guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add openfwwf-firmware.


From: Leo Famulari
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add openfwwf-firmware.
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 16:04:30 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:29:18PM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> Hello Guix,
> 
> We've had at least one person on IRC confirm that this firmware package
> worked for them, allowing them to use their wireless hardware.
> 
> Would it be appropriate to add this to %base-firmware?  The output is
> rather small.

How small?

Since they seem to work, I'd say they should be added.

> From c397f73d69326db24c211e4e2bda46e647d0e751 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Eric Bavier <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 13:57:01 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openfwwf-firmware.
> 
> * gnu/packages/firmware.scm (b43-tools, openfwwf-firmware): New
> variables.

> +(define-public b43-tools
> +  (let ((commit "8dce53297966b31b6c70a7a03c2433978dd9f288")
> +        (rev "1"))

How do we choose a commit?

> +    (package
> +      (name "b43-tools")
> +      (version (string-append "20140625-" rev "." (string-take commit 7)))

Is the timestamp some kind of upstream version string? If not, and there
is no upstream version naming, we should use 0.0.0, right?

> +         #:phases
> +         (let ((subdirs '("assembler" "disassembler"))) ;TODO: fwcutter

Can you expand the TODO comment?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]