guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libtermkey


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libtermkey
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 14:40:17 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.23.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

José Miguel Sánchez García <address@hidden> writes:

> Add libtermkey (I hope it's finally correct!)

Hi José,

Thanks for your contribution! The patch looks mostly good, see comments
inline.

>
> -- 
> José Miguel Sánchez García
> From 8ad5713a25aeb40b9021b30beba7b11d3cf432df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Jos=C3=A9=20Miguel=20S=C3=A1nchez=20Garc=C3=ADa?=
>  <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:12:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add libtermkey.
>
> ---
>  gnu/packages/libtermkey.scm | 54 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gnu/packages/libtermkey.scm

I think this should go in 'terminals.scm' instead of a new file. We try
to categorize related programs together to keep the file count low.

> diff --git a/gnu/packages/libtermkey.scm b/gnu/packages/libtermkey.scm
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..e3280ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gnu/packages/libtermkey.scm
> @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> +;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
> +;;; Copyright © 2016 José Miguel Sánchez García <address@hidden>
> +;;;
> +;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
> +;;;
> +;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> +;;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +;;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at
> +;;; your option) any later version.
> +;;;
> +;;; GNU Guix is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
> +;;; WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +;;; GNU General Public License for more details.
> +;;;
> +;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +;;; along with GNU Guix.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> +
> +(define-module (gnu packages libtermkey)
> +  #:use-module (guix packages)
> +  #:use-module (guix download)
> +  #:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
> +  #:use-module (guix licenses)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages autotools)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages ncurses)
> +  #:use-module (gnu packages pkg-config))
> +
> +(define-public libtermkey
> +  (package
> +    (name "libtermkey")
> +    (version "0.18")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method url-fetch)
> +              (uri (string-append "http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/";
> +                                  name "/" name "-" version ".tar.gz"))
> +              (sha256
> +                (base32 
> "09ir16kaarv55mnc4jn2sqnjjhzpb1aha51wpd9ayif887g4d5r3"))))
> +    (build-system gnu-build-system)
> +    (arguments '(

Please move the "'(" to the next line so that the indentation matches
the start of the expression. Or move #:make-flags one line up and
re-indent the rest of the block, but I think starting the 'arguments' on
a new line looks better.

> +      #:make-flags (list
> +        "CC=gcc"
> +        (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))
> +      #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +        (delete 'configure))
> +      #:tests? #f))
> +    (native-inputs `(("libtool", libtool)
> +                     ("ncurses", ncurses)
> +                     ("pkg-config", pkg-config)))

Are any of these inputs used at runtime and not just required for
building? If so, they should be a regular 'input' and not a
'native-input'. ncurses is usually linked as a library and thus needs to
match the target architecture.

See the 'package' reference in the Guix manual for more information:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/guix.html#package-Reference

Guix will often automatically detect whether inputs are runtime
dependencies. You can run `guix gc -R $(./pre-inst-env guix build
libtermkey)` to check which inputs are referenced by the built product.

> +    (synopsis "Keyboard entry processing libary for terminal-based programs")
                                               ^ missing 'r' :-) 

> +    (description
> +      "Libtermkey handles all the necessary logic to recognise special keys, 
> UTF-8
> +combining, and so on, with a simple interface.")
> +    (home-page "http://www.leonerd.org.uk/code/libtermkey";)
> +    (license expat)))

The rest LGTM. Can you send an updated patch for 'terminals.scm'
addressing the above points? Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]