|
From: | Ben Woodcroft |
Subject: | Re: Per-package updaters? |
Date: | Tue, 27 Dec 2016 09:48:54 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 |
Hi Ricardo, On 27/12/16 01:00, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
How about we piggy-back on the good work of others, by putting a declaration in the package definition that the package has sister packages in other package managers? This would involve a level of munging of the other packager's versions, but this seems not difficult for well disciplined numbering schemes.Hi Guix, we have a couple of generic package updaters (CPAN, CRAN, Bioconductor, Github, GNU, etc), but they don’t nearly cover all of our packages. I wonder if we should add one-off updaters for individual packages that don’t fall into any of the generic classes of updaters. Another question is how to implement them. Would there be another optional field in package expressions containing a Guile script to run to determine updates for the current package? What are your opinions on this?
ben
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |