Re: Editing Scheme in the installation image

[Maxim Cournoyer]

address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Mike Gran <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> The functions expressed in Scheme in Zile-on-Guile are the same
>> as upstream Zile had.  It is a fairly limited set.
>> Zile-on-Guile is a Scheme, not an elisp, even though the functions
>> it expresses have elisp-like names. So there is little portability
>> between Emacs and this Zile.
>
> Yes.  Any idea how hard it would be to port the real Paredit to
> Zile-on-Guile?

Isn't there native support for elisp in Guile? Would this allow running
directly Paredit (elisp), provided that Zile-on-Guile implements
everything that Paredit needs from the Emacs API?

This is probably more work in the short term than rewriting Paredit in
Scheme, but it would enable Zile-on-Guile to potentially run (m)any Emacs
packages.

Maxim