|
From: | David Craven |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/4] file-systems: Refactor check-file-system. |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:17:14 +0100 |
> What’s wrong with using “fsck.extN” like we did before? fsck.extN is exactly the same binary as e2fsck when compiled statically. This reduces the e2fsck/static package to a third of it's previous size. David
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |