Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: Add libfilezilla.

[rennes]

Hello Maxim,

On 2017-02-12 20:26, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Hi,
offering/offers/ or s/offering/provides/
> > +    (license gpl3+)))
>
> Only license information I could find is the COPYING file which is
> GPLv2. I think gpl2+ would be more appropriate.

grepping libfilezilla directory, i see glp2 and gpl3:

libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/depcomp:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/compile:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/missing:# the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.guess:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 3 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/ltmain.sh:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 2 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/config.sub:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 3 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/config/test-driver:# the Free Software Foundation; 
either version 2, or (at your option)
libfilezilla-0.9.0/configure:# published by the Free Software 
Foundation; either version 2 of
libfilezilla-0.9.0/COPYING:    the Free Software Foundation; either 
version 2 of the License, or
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_link_flag.m4:#   Free Software 
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_check_compile_flag.m4:#   Free Software 
Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/libtool.m4:# published by the Free Software 
Foundation; either version 2 of
libfilezilla-0.9.0/m4/ax_append_flag.m4:#   Free Software Foundation, 
either version 3 of the License, or (at your
libfilezilla-0.9.0/README:the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 
of the License, or

Should I put both?
Thanks