guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!


From: Marius Bakke
Subject: Re: Let’s freeze and build ‘core-updates’!
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:03:52 +0100
User-agent: Notmuch/0.23.5 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:

> Hey Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hello Guix!
>>>
>>> Since I’m about to leave keyboard for a couple of weeks, here’s a to-do
>>> list for those of you who’ll be around.  :-)
>>>
>>> The last things I wanted to push for ‘core-updates’ were a reproducible
>>> Guile (done in b5efd14a9add1bcb4a44fa5b9c1b47706f3df9da), and a subset
>>> or all of the aarch64 patches, depending on their status (should not be
>>> a blocker IMO).
>>>
>>> So, here’s a plan:
>>>
>>>   • Once Efraim has pushed some of the aarch64 patches, do another
>>>     evaluation of the “core” package set for that branch, and check for
>>>     anything wrong.  From there on, forbid full-rebuild changes.
>>>
>>>   • Once the “core” subset builds correctly on all the supported
>>>     platforms (those that Hydra supports), merge ‘master’.  Maybe update
>>>     a couple of things like GnuTLS while we’re at it.  From there on
>>>     forbid non-trivial changes.
>>>
>>>   • Build all the packages.  (To do that, someone with access to Hydra
>>>     must change the “subset” argument to “all” in the config of the
>>>     ‘core-updates’ jobset.)
>>>
>>>   • Fix things.
>>>
>>>   • Once most regressions have been addressed and most binaries are
>>>     available, merge ‘core-updates’ into ‘master’.
>>>
>>> How does that sound?
>>
>> This sounds great. I have a question:
>>
>> The 'staging' branch contains a number of minor updates and it's been
>> more than a month since the last merge. Should we do a staging
>> evaluation first (i.e. next few days), or just merge it to core-updates?
>
> Good point.  I’d just merge it into ‘core-updates’ at this point.

I believe Efraim has pushed the remaining aarch64 patches, and I just
merged in the updates from staging, as well as an xorg and cmake update.

I think we're ready to build the "core" package set now. Mark, Leo?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]