Re: stability of master - just QA and hydra is not enough

[Leo Famulari]

On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:24:25PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
> > First, is there some outstanding bug that needs to be fixed? It's
> > frustrating to get messages like this without any context.
> 
> Yes, but I certainly will not run reconfigure on here from HEAD
> again. When I ran into this I had not git setup, now I have.
> So someone else must do this.

I spent my time to find the bug and report it:
<https://bugs.gnu.org/27551>

> So you're basically saying: yes good idea, I agree but this is too much
> presure on too little capacity in people and machines and we can not
> do any of this any time soon.
> Or did I miss something?

I'm saying that we could do better.

I don't think that requiring more review of proposed changes from
project members is a good idea. Already, patch review is too much work.
Not to mention all the other work.

Automated QA is a good idea but we currently lack the resources to do
it.

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature