[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release!
|
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
|
Subject: |
Re: Release! |
|
Date: |
Sat, 7 Oct 2017 11:18:20 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
Am 07.10.2017 um 01:31 schrieb David Pirotte:
> so why would we 'abandon' s-exp, what would we win here?
It might be interesting to *create* these files using tools written in
other programming languages. And modules for creating *JSON* are
available for most programming languages.
(OTOH TOML[]1] could be a better format than JSON – it's much like
.ini-files, but more formal specification. A scheme implementation is
available [2].)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOML
[2] 0f52bab3e3cfeb261110f9217c39eb03e78d026a
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
[PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Mark H Weaver, 2017/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Efraim Flashner, 2017/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/09
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/09