[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is anyone opposed to GnuTLS with DANE by default?
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is anyone opposed to GnuTLS with DANE by default? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Nov 2017 11:08:04 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <address@hidden> skribis:
> I certainly don't object, but am forced to note that ’gnutls-dane’ more
> than doubles the closure size of ‘gnutls’ proper (294.2 MiB vs. 138.5).
>
> The only new input is ‘unbound’, but that manages to pull in both
> Pythons 2 and 3. It would be nice™ if it could first be -minimalised...
Yes, to me that’s a showstopper. (One of the Pythons comes from
libevent.)
Thanks,
Ludo’.