guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Idea: Install script to better support improving contributor-friendl


From: Ludovic Courtès
Subject: Re: Idea: Install script to better support improving contributor-friendliness of projects
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 17:11:15 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux)

Hello,

Mark H Weaver <address@hidden> skribis:

> Никита Чураев <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Here's how I want to use Guix and it is to increase
>> contributor-friendliness of a project, so that the user can simply run
>> a distribution-independent command to install all dependencies without
>> having to hunt for them with `apt` and `dnf` manually.
>>
>> Unfortunately, Guix itself is not very easy to install, and the
>> instructions are full of rather technical stuff like 'systemd' and
>> 'upstart'.
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html
>>
>> There should be a script like the one Haskell Stack uses:
>>
>> |curl -sSL https://get.haskellstack.org/ | sh|
>
> I can understand the appeal of such a convenient approach.  However,
> this practice of downloading a script via HTTPS and immediately running
> it as root without inspection puts you at considerable risk.  A
> man-in-the-middle with the resources to compromise or bribe *any*
> certificate authority in your trust store (the attacker could choose
> which one) could acquire a fraudulent certificate to impersonate our
> site, and then substitute in a different script than the one we
> provided.  Quite a few organizations are capable of such an attack
> today.
>
> Therefore, I believe it would be irresponsible for us to promote this
> style of installation.

Seconded.

> However, if there's sufficient interest, and if we could produce a
> sufficiently robust "auto-install" script, we could perhaps do something
> close to what you suggested.  We could provide a script along with a
> GnuPG digital signature.  We could ask the user to download the script,
> acquire our signing key, verify the signature on the script, and then
> run the script as root.

I while back Chris Baines and someone else (?) had worked on such a
script, but I’m not sure what happened.

Chris, does that ring a bell?

It would be nice to have it in time for the new release.

Ludo’.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]