[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3
|
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
|
Subject: |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:04:21 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Hi Pjotr,
no offense meant, but I have the impression you did not read my analysis
and proposals, did you?
> I propose we patch the interpreter to tell about the Guix paths. It
> probably only needs to be done in one place. They should go after the
> PYTHONPATH as it is done by Python itself, like you suggested earlier.
See option 3 of my analysis part 3.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/13
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/03/14
Re: PYTHONPATH issue explanation, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/15