[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3
|
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
|
Subject: |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:21:11 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 10:04:21AM +0100, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Hi Pjotr,
>
> no offense meant, but I have the impression you did not read my analysis
> and proposals, did you?
No offense taken. I did and do read them, but the analysis is not
exactly accessible for my small brain, especially when you go into
symlinks in part 3.
No need to over-analyse. Sometimes you just have to try and see what
breaks. We probably are talking at cross-purposes.
Pj.
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/13
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/03/14
Re: PYTHONPATH issue explanation, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/15