[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2018 12:42:47 +0100 |
Thank you the explanations.
> New Bioconductor packages should go to bioconductor.scm. Eventually we
> may move all remaining R packages from bioinformatics to
> bioconductor.scm.
I am a bit confused.
The file bioconductor.scm contains (or will contain) all R packages
from Bioconductor, right?
But R packages from CRAN used in Bioinformatics ? bioconductor.scm or
bioinformatics.scm?
And I am asking myself if a massive import from Bioconductor should be
possible ?
- bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/11
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/12
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?,
zimoun <=
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/12
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Björn Höfling, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, zimoun, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/18
- Re: bioinformatics.scm vs bioconductor.scm ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/12/20